<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Domaining - Expired Domain Names - Expiring Domain Names &#187; WIPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainerincome.com/news/category/wipo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainerincome.com/news</link>
	<description>Changing Domain Name Investment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:38:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Aussie Giant Woolworths Wins WIPO Claim In .AU</title>
		<link>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/woolworths-wins-woolies-online/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=woolworths-wins-woolies-online</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/woolworths-wins-woolies-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.com.au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Cash Pty Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woolworths Limited]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainerincome.com/news/?p=1441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 5, 2011, the Domain Name resolved to a web page containing sponsored advertising links, including links to the Complainant and its competitor, Coles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="standard" count="" href="http://www.domainerincome.com/news/woolworths-wins-woolies-online/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwoolworths-wins-woolies-online%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwoolworths-wins-woolies-online%2F&amp;source=domainerincome&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=domainer%3AR_1d81f833c7c0a59d1c23cb3dfcd8142f&amp;hashtags=Save+Cash+Pty+Ltd.,Woolworths+Limited&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>According to WIPO, the domain wooliesonline.com.au &#8220;<em>was registered on March 24, 2011. On July 5, 2011, the Domain Name resolved to a web page containing sponsored advertising links, including links to the Complainant and its competitor, Coles. Following a cease and desist letter from the Complainant, the web page was changed to remove the references to the Complainant.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that &#8220;Prior to the cease and desist letter the Domain Name was parked showing certain advertisements outside the Respondents control.&#8221;  The Panel found that Woollies &#8220;<em>is so well-known that it is inconceivable that the Domain Name could be used in a way that would not mislead Internet users.</em>&#8221; More info: <a title="Woolworths vs Save Cash" href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/AUDND/2011/29.html" target="_blank">Woolworths Limited v. Save Cash Pty Ltd</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see companies taking action against those that register and/or use domain names in bad faith.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1441"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwoolworths-wins-woolies-online%2F' data-shr_title='Aussie+Giant+Woolworths+Wins+WIPO+Claim+In+.AU'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwoolworths-wins-woolies-online%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/woolworths-wins-woolies-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM Holden Wins Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/gm-holden-wins-domains/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gm-holden-wins-domains</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/gm-holden-wins-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.com.au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley John Lawless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holden platinum service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holden service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Platinum Automotive Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servicing holden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainerincome.com/news/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What makes this interesting is that its not just some dodgy cybersquatter who is registering domains, its a car servicing company! They decided to register holdenplatinumservice.com.au, holdenservice.net.au and servicingholden.com.au. You can guess what happens next Holden claims the domains are misleading and deceptive and WIPO finds that all the domains were: 1. Registered in bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="standard" count="" href="http://www.domainerincome.com/news/gm-holden-wins-domains/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgm-holden-wins-domains%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgm-holden-wins-domains%2F&amp;source=domainerincome&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=domainer%3AR_1d81f833c7c0a59d1c23cb3dfcd8142f&amp;hashtags=Bradley+John+Lawless,holden+platinum+service,holden+service,Platinum+Automotive+Group,servicing+holden,WIPO&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>What makes this interesting is that its not just some dodgy cybersquatter who is registering domains, its a car servicing company! They decided to register holdenplatinumservice.com.au, holdenservice.net.au and servicingholden.com.au. You can guess what happens next <img src='http://www.domainerincome.com/news/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Holden claims the domains are misleading and deceptive and <a title="GM Holden Ltd. v. Bradley John Lawless" href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2010/dau2010-0010.html" target="_blank">WIPO finds</a> that all the domains were:</p>
<p>1. Registered in bad faith.</p>
<p>2. Confusingly similar to GM Holden’s trademarks.</p>
<p>and the list goes on&#8230;. This is a lesson for Domainers and SEO companies who think they can &#8220;own an industry&#8221;. Here is one particular quote I like:</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>the multiple registrations of domain names, not only including the  Complainant’s trade mark but those of many other motor car  manufacturers, strongly leads to a conclusion that the Respondent is  seeking to divert the business of Internet users away from the  authorised service centres of the Complainant and other manufacturers.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Good decision WIPO.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-836"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgm-holden-wins-domains%2F' data-shr_title='GM+Holden+Wins+Domains'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgm-holden-wins-domains%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/gm-holden-wins-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burger King Delayed In Russia After Domain Name Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/burgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=burgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/burgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burger king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burgerking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burgerking.ru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainerincome.com/news/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Burger King has delayed the launch of its Russian expansion until 2010 after failing to register the domain name burgerking.ru. A Scandinavian company registered the domain name and Burger King Corporation (who registered its trademark in Russia back in 1994) doesn&#8217;t want to pay for it. It appears that this dispute is headed for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="standard" count="" href="http://www.domainerincome.com/news/burgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fburgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fburgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute%2F&amp;source=domainerincome&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=domainer%3AR_1d81f833c7c0a59d1c23cb3dfcd8142f&amp;hashtags=burger+king,burgerking,burgerking.ru,dispute,domain+name,russia&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0px 5px;" src="http://www.kommersant.ru/Issues.photo/DAILY/2009/240/KMO_088197_91817_1_t207.jpg" alt="King's Burger is judged for the domain of burgerking.ru" width="177" height="288" />Burger King has delayed the launch of its Russian expansion until 2010 after failing to register the domain name burgerking.ru.</p>
<p>A Scandinavian company registered the domain name and Burger King Corporation (who registered its trademark in Russia back in 1994) doesn&#8217;t want to pay for it.</p>
<p>It appears that this dispute is headed for the Russian courts.</p>
<p>Source: <a title="Forgery under the hamburger" href="http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1297726" target="_blank">Kommersant</a> (Written in Russian).</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-441"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fburgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute%2F' data-shr_title='Burger+King+Delayed+In+Russia+After+Domain+Name+Dispute'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fburgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/burgerking-delayed-in-russia-after-domain-name-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Gets Googblog.com Back From Indian</title>
		<link>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/google-gets-googblog-domain/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-gets-googblog-domain</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/google-gets-googblog-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 03:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harit shah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainerincome.com/news/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day, another WIPO (World Intellectual Property Org) case. Google vs Harit Shah for the domain name googblog.com. For some strange, unforseen, unknown reason, it was apparently too close to the Google trademark. Who would have thought? Shah said, &#8220;I was in a bad faith that I can legally keep the domain googblog.com. I really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="standard" count="" href="http://www.domainerincome.com/news/google-gets-googblog-domain/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgoogle-gets-googblog-domain%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgoogle-gets-googblog-domain%2F&amp;source=domainerincome&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=domainer%3AR_1d81f833c7c0a59d1c23cb3dfcd8142f&amp;hashtags=domain+name+case,googblog,google,harit+shah,WIPO&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Another day, another WIPO (World Intellectual Property Org) case. Google vs Harit Shah for the domain name googblog.com. For some strange, unforseen, unknown reason, it was apparently too close to the Google trademark. Who would have thought?</p>
<p>Shah said, &#8220;I was in a bad faith that I can legally keep the domain googblog.com. I really did very unfair to Google. I sincerely apologize to Google for infringement by misusing their intellectual property.&#8221;</p>
<p>Via: <a title="Google wins domain case against an Indian" href="http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/Google_wins_domain_case_against_an_Indian-nid-57376.html" target="_self">SiliconIndia</a> and <a title="Google wins cybersquatting case against Indian man" href="http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2009/05/28/4201359.htm" target="_self">TMC</a>.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-211"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgoogle-gets-googblog-domain%2F' data-shr_title='Google+Gets+Googblog.com+Back+From+Indian'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fgoogle-gets-googblog-domain%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/google-gets-googblog-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WIPO To Go Paperless For UDRP &#8211; Saves HOW MUCH Paper?</title>
		<link>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/wipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/wipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paperless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainerincome.com/news/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WIPO has sent a letter to ICANN to &#8220;seriously consider moving towards an essentially paperless UDRP&#8221;. Here are some interesting stats that appear in the letter: Over the lifespan of the UDRP, the total number of pages filed with WIPO alone is estimated at some ten million (roughly equivalent to over one thousand trees). The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="standard" count="" href="http://www.domainerincome.com/news/wipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper%2F&amp;source=domainerincome&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=domainer%3AR_1d81f833c7c0a59d1c23cb3dfcd8142f&amp;hashtags=environment,icann,paperless,UDRP,WIPO&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>WIPO has <a title="WIPO letter" href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/wilbers-to-jeffrey-08oct08.pdf" target="_blank">sent a letter</a> to ICANN to &#8220;seriously consider moving towards an essentially paperless UDRP&#8221;. Here are some interesting stats that appear in the letter:</p>
<ul>
<li>Over the lifespan of the UDRP, the total number of pages filed with WIPO alone is estimated at some ten million (roughly equivalent to over one thousand trees).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The approximate number of paper pages from Respondents is over 300,000.</li>
</ul>
<p>The letter outlines a number of reasons including:</p>
<ol>
<li>Environmentally friendly</li>
<li>Efficient &#8211; leading to cost savings</li>
<li>Most already file electronically anyway</li>
<li>4% email bounce back in 2008</li>
<li>The average time that elapsed between WIPO&#8217;s receipt of the electronic Compalint and its receipt of the hard copies was four days. &#8220;<em>A delay in receipt of a Response in hard copy may also delay the Panel&#8217;s review of the complete record</em>&#8220;.</li>
</ol>
<p>I think this is a great move. Although I&#8217;m not surprised that its WIPO taking the initiative to suggest an improvement to an ICANN process. It just goes to show how inefficient ICANN is.</p>
<p>Although this week I did have similar, strange technology interactions with two companies:</p>
<ol>
<li>Company A &#8211; a webhost asked me to print out, scan in and email them a copy of an invoice that I received via email. Apparently their process said that email (text) wasn&#8217;t good enough.</li>
<li>Company B &#8211; asked me to email them, post a hardcopy and fax them the same document.</li>
</ol>
<p>Its 2009 and we are still using fax machines and printing stuff out &#8211; unbelievable. Shouldn&#8217;t we all have jet-packs by now?</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-181"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper%2F' data-shr_title='WIPO+To+Go+Paperless+For+UDRP+-+Saves+HOW+MUCH+Paper%3F'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.domainerincome.com%2Fnews%2Fwipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainerincome.com/news/wipo-to-go-paperless-for-udrp-saves-how-much-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

