ID: Pass:  
 

Posts Tagged ‘expired domain name’

Good Domains From The Domainer Meeting Paris 2008

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

EuroDNS is hosting a Domainer Meeting in Paris from June 19-20 2008 with a SnapNames Live Auction. Unfortunately I can’t make it to this one, but here are a list of good names to bid on:

  • Xp.com
  • Chocolate.net
  • Receipe.org
  • Order.net
  • Silver.net
  • Italian.net
  • Denmark.net
  • Pizza.info
  • Fotos.net
  • Podcasts.net
  • Catholic.eu
  • Motorbikes.net
  • Hotels.eu
  • Versailles.com

If you are in Europe, this would be “the meeting” to check out. FYI: DomainSponsor clients are eligible for a discounted registration code up to €160 off. You can get this by contacting your Account Manager. Hopefully I’ve saved you some $$$.


Today’s Domain Name Drop Cancelled

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

Just over an hour ago I received notice from Pool:

“We have received notice from Verisign that today’s drop has been cancelled due to technical difficulties on their end. We have been told by Verisign that the domains from today’s drop will be included in tomorrow’s drop. As we receive further information from the registry, we will be sure to keep you advised.”

Like me, you are probably asking, how exactly does a domain name drop get canceled? Hopefully I will have some answers on this soon. Stay tuned!


Pool.com Drops Catch & Release

Friday, May 30th, 2008

Pool.com recently notified its customers that their catch and release system will no longer attempt to register domains from customer request queues.I have personally used Pool’s Catch & Release service and was quite puzzled by this move. C&R provided a really easy way to taste names, with minimal risk. It was also a lot cheaper than other companies that provide domain tasting / refunds.

Why Did Pool Dropped C&R?

It all begins with ICANN. In October 2007, the ICANN GNSO Council launched a policy development process (PDP) on domain tasting. icann logoThey produced an Initial Report for public comment that outlined the possible actions to be taken, and the arguments for and against such actions. Public comments were incorporated into a draft Final Report (posted 8 February) for GNSO Council review and action.

The GNSO Council approved a motion which effectively changes the AGP - where domains can be returned within five days without cost. The motion, which is pending for Board action, would prohibit any gTLD operator that has implemented an “add grace period” (AGP) from offering a refund to a registrar for any domain name deleted during the AGP that exceeds 10% of its net new registrations during that month, or fifty domain names, whichever is greater.

What Does Pool.com Think About This?

In an exclusive interview with DomainerIncome.com, Richard Schreier, CEO of Pool.com said the “decision to allow the $0.25 fee is a prudent business decision” and that “domain tasting will be far more selective and the economics of doing tasting
will change.”

So - what’s my take on this?

On the GNSO Council report; like anything masked under the guise of “security” these days, nobody is prepared to stand up and question it.

It’s obvious to me that ICANN has too many want-to-be, jet setting politicians and anti-business Internet purists who can’t stand “their Internet” being used to make money. That is, unless its for big American companies like Verisign.

Unfortunately, the Domain Name Industry is too fragmented and doesn’t have the funds in one single entity to hire a fleet of lobbyists and PR consultants to educate the market about such changes.


Affiliate Program | Terms & Conditions | Privacy